Post

Log inSign up

Post

MTS on X: "IFP @fiiiiiist on why lifting export controls wouldn't stop China from spending a full CHIPS Act worth of money every year to reduce US chip dependency: "I don't buy this argument. The most important reason is that China is very distrustful of the US. We have already shown we're https://t.co/ePE5Idn0rn"

  • user avatar
    MTS
    @MTSlive
    IFP @fiiiiiist on why lifting export controls wouldn't stop China from spending a full CHIPS Act worth of money every year to reduce US chip dependency: "I don't buy this argument. The most important reason is that China is very distrustful of the US. We have already shown we're willing to use export controls on compute to slow their ability to develop frontier AI systems." "If we stopped doing that tomorrow, it is very unlikely they'd say, everything's fine. Let's pause our own investments into our semiconductor manufacturing ecosystem." "Like every other industry before, they are instead going to be like, yes, great, let's continue spending roughly a CHIPS Act worth of money, 50 billion-ish every single year on revitalizing this, because we know we have this strategic vulnerability in what might be the world's most important technology." "That possibility may have existed several years ago, but definitely doesn't now. China is aggressively chasing semiconductor dependency." @IFP
    00:00
    10:37 PM · Aug 11, 20262.5KViews
  • user avatar
    AxiomOS
    @axiomos_
    2h
    The chip dependency point goes beyond chips. Once AI becomes critical infrastructure, relying on a single external layer gets harder to justify. That’s why coordination and execution layers will matter too.

Log in or sign up for X

See what’s happening and join the conversation

Continue with phone
or
Log in with username or email

Relevant people

Avatar
MTS@MTSliveFollow
Chronicling the singularity

Trending now

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.